• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning

University of Mississippi

Hide Search
  • About
    • Mission and Purpose
    • History
    • Meet Our Team
    • Location & Hours
  • Services
  • Programs
    • Faculty
      • Faculty Reading Group
      • Inclusive Teaching Learning Community
      • Teaching Development Grants
    • Graduate Students
      • Graduate Teaching Orientation
      • Fundamentals of Teaching
      • Graduate Reading Group
      • Graduate Teaching Credentials
      • Graduate Excellence in Teaching Awards
      • Graduate Consultant Program
      • Graduate Teaching Resources
    • Supplemental Instruction
      • Student Information
      • SI Schedule Fall 2023
  • Events
  • Resources
    • Teaching Resources
    • Teaching Awards
      • University Teaching Awards
      • Graduate Excellence in Teaching Awards
  • Blog
  • Thank an Instructor
  • Show Search

Events

Recap: What Instructors Need to Know When Working with Neurodivergent Students

· Sep 13, 2023 ·

by Liz Norell, associate director of instructional support

In our August 8 blog, we shared a preview of our September 8 workshop on supporting neurodivergent students, including the following definitions of key terms:

  • Neurodivergent: a person with a brain that processes information in a way different from most individuals.
  • Neurotypical: a person with a brain that processes information in a way typical of most individuals.
  • Neurodiverse: a group of people with diverse ways of processing information, including those considered typical.

Because any learning space (or any group gathering, for that matter) includes people with diverse ways of knowing, processing information, and learning, all of these spaces will be neurodiverse. Meeting the needs of the neurodivergent, though, requires some awareness and intentionality.

Neurodivergent describes those who have some condition that impacts how their brains work; this might be a learning disability, attention deficit or anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, Tourette’s syndrome, bipolar disorder, and more.

In our workshop, we talked about the two most common neurodivergent conditions that show up in college classrooms: autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

But first, a few notes about language. Some disability advocates prefer to use what’s called person-first language (e.g., a person with ADHD, a person with autism), whereas others prefer identity-first language (e.g., an autistic person, an ADHD person). Recent research suggests that in the United States, autistic adults largely prefer identity-first language (“I am autistic”) over person-first language (“I have autism”), whereas friends, family members, and professionals often expressed a preference for person-first language.

Within disability advocacy networks, the terms Asperger’s syndrome and high-/low-functioning are no longer used. We also use bipolar disorder to describe the condition, rather than the outdated manic-depressive terminology.

Autism

Many of us have a stereotype in our minds about what autism looks like. It’s usually a young boy who is somewhat withdrawn, doesn’t make eye contact, makes repetitive movements, and is hyper-focused on a few specific interests. There is some truth to that stereotype, but it’s far from a complete picture of how this neurodivergence manifests in all autistic people.

Things you might notice among students and colleagues who are autistic:

  • Repetitive movements, like rocking, tapping, or picking at things
  • Unusual eye contact (too little or too much)
  • Overly eager desire to share information
  • Anxiety during transitions or unexpected events
  • “The lights are too loud”
  • Needing something explained multiple times
  • Meltdowns (including crying) for no apparent reason
  • Fixation on minor details
  • Seemingly distracted gaze out a window or at something on the wall

Autism is formally known as “autism spectrum disorder,” or ASD, because there is a wide range of symptoms that people with autism experience, both in type and severity. People with autism can be very successful in educational and professional contexts, particularly if those settings are supportive of neurodivergent people. There are many often-overlooked benefits to having an autistic brain, such as the ability to hyperfocus, exhibit unusual attention to detail, and creativity. The film Autism Goes to College and its companion podcast, which shares stories of neurodivergent college students, are terrific resources for those in higher ed.

ADHD

We also have a stereotype about what ADHD looks like. It’s usually (once again) a young boy who cannot sit still, talks quickly, and interrupts often. While this may be true, ADHD looks different across those who have this kind of neurodivergent brain. You might notice:

  • Cannot seem to talk fast enough to get ideas out
  • Bursts of speech
  • Paralyzing reaction to negative feedback
  • “A racecar brain with bicycle breaks” (a phrase coined by Dr. Edward Hallowell)
  • Crave novelty, excitement, and challenge
  • Work better when around someone else (“body doubling”)
  • Appear to be “lazy” (but this is a mischaracterization)
  • Difficulty sitting still–often fidgeting or needing to move
  • Easily distracted by something interesting

One of my favorite writers about ADHD, a British woman who writes as “Authentically Emily” online, says that ADHD brains have an “interest-based nervous system,” as opposed to a neurotypical’s “importance-based nervous system.” Emily says that ADHD brains need at least one of the following four components to focus their attention on a specific task:

  1. Novelty: The task is new and exciting in some way.
  2. Interest: The person is deeply interested in the task or topic.
  3. Challenge: A sense of competition or inherent difficulty motivates attention.
  4. Urgency: The task needs to be done right now.

Lacking any of these four components, and a task might be impossible for a person with ADHD to focus their attention long enough to complete it.

This is why Karen Costa, who is working on a book for educators about ADHD, urges instructors to provide structure and deadlines for their students: “Many ADHDers need more structure, not less. We need more deadlines, not less.” (Listen to Karen Costa on the Teaching in Higher Ed podcast to learn more.)

Tangible steps to support neurodivergent students

Although neurodivergence shows up differently for each person, there are many things you can do as an instructor to help give your neurodivergent students equitable access to learning and success. Here are a few ideas:

  • Openly welcome students of all abilities and neurotypes. Something as simple as a statement that says: “If you are disabled, I welcome a conversation to discuss your learning needs. I want to make sure you succeed in our course.” Don’t assume every neurodivergent student has a diagnosis or formal accommodations; the testing process to obtain a diagnosis is lengthy and costly, and the process of requesting formal accommodations is also time-consuming. Look for ways to design your course so students need as few accommodations as possible, and every student will benefit. (There are some good language examples here.)
  • Manage the sensory input in your spaces. Look for ways to dampen the sensory overload many neurodivergent students struggle to manage. For example, can you dim the lights? Use indirect or diffuse lighting? If you have a whole-class discussion, discourage cross-talk (multiple people talking at once) to limit the auditory noise. Allow students to rearrange the furniture to meet their needs, such as physically separating their chair/desk to a corner or sitting on the floor if they like. Explicitly welcome things like doodling, knitting/crocheting, coloring, using fidget toys, or occasionally moving around the room.
  • Communicate clearly and regularly. Share your expectations and directions multiple times and explicitly. Don’t assume your students can pick up on subtle cues or social norms. Limit your use of sarcasm or inside jokes—and if you use them, be over-the-top in signaling that you’re doing so. Define any subjective or unclear terminology in concrete terms (e.g., professional, collaboration, effectiveness, etc.). Provide written complements to any verbal directions and provide other ways to access important material outside of class.
  • Ensure social interactions are intentional and clear. Normalize stimming behaviors in and out of class—by which I mean make it explicitly allowable, even encouraged. Clearly define the purpose and expected roles in any interpersonal interactions (such as think-pair-share or groupwork activities in class). Whenever possible, offer an option to work alone. Provide students with alternative ways (other than verbally) to communicate or interact with one another and with you.
  • Create (flexible) structures. Hide or remove any unnecessary or unused features in Blackboard. Whenever a specific skill is needed (such as time management or completing a multi-stage project/assignment), provide how-to directions (or link to them). Scaffold assignments to create regular and meaningful deadlines. Assume good intentions and allow your students to make mistakes without debilitating penalties. (For more advice on this point, listen to this interview with instructional designer Cathryn Friel.)

If you want to learn even more, you can download the presentation deck or to reach out to Liz in CETL.

Student Disability Services can also provide meaningful support for faculty who have neurodivergent students in their classes—as most of us do.

Policies and Practices for Generative AI in Fall Courses

· Aug 15, 2023 ·

by Derek Bruff, visiting associate director

Last Friday, CETL co-sponsored an online workshop titled “Generative AI on the Syllabus” with our parent organization, the Academic Innovations Group (AIG). Bob Cummings, executive director of AIG, and I spent an hour with 170 faculty, staff, and graduate students exploring options for banning, embracing, and exploring generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Bing Chat, and Google Bard in our fall courses.

After starting the session providing a brief overview of the current landscape of generative AI tools, I asked participants to provide a few words describing how they were feeling about generative AI and its impact on teaching and learning. The resulting word cloud (seen below) is full of words like excited, curious, and intrigued, but also apprehensive, concerned, and overwhelmed. It was clear to me that the instructors present on Friday hadn’t completely figured out their approach to generative AI for the fall.

Bob and I then shared the CETL Syllabus Template, a document that has suggested syllabus language, information about UM policies, and links to course design resources. My CETL colleague Emily Donahoe led a small team of us this summer in developing a new section of that template focused on generative AI. If you’re still working on your AI policy for the fall, I high recommend opening that document and scrolling to page 9 for some thoughtful options to consider. (Please note: We have released AI section of the Syllabus Template under a Creative Commons license so that those outside of the University of Mississippi can use and adapt it as they like.)

For example, if you’re leaning toward prohibiting the use of AI text generators in your course, you might use the suggested syllabus language under the heading “Use of Generative AI Not Permitted”:

Generative AI refers to artificial intelligence technologies, like those used for ChatGPT or Midjourney, that can draw on a large corpus of training data to create new written, visual, or audio content. In this course, we’ll be developing skills that are important to practice on your own. Because use of generative AI may inhibit the development of those skills, I ask that you refrain from employing AI tools in this course. Using such tools for any purposes, or attempting to pass off AI-generated work as your own, will violate our academic integrity policy. I treat potential academic integrity violations by […]

If you’re unsure about whether or not a specific tool makes use of AI or is permitted for use on assignments in this course, please contact me.

You’ll need to fill in those ellipses with your own words, but this is a good start on a conversation with students about use of generative AI in their learning process in your course.

If you’re more open to student use of generative AI tools in your course, then read the section titled “Use of Generative AI Permitted (with or without limitations).” That section offers language to talk about the ways AI tools can support or hinder learning, appropriate uses of generative AI tools in your course, and options for disclosing one’s use of an AI tool on an assignment (e.g. the APA’s newly issued recommendations). That section also lists a number of AI tools as a reminder that we’re not just talking about ChatGPT here.

The recommendation section of the syllabus template expands on that idea:

As you craft your policy, please keep in mind that students may encounter generative AI in a variety of programs: chatbots like ChatGPT; image generators like DALL-E or Midjourney; writing and research assistants like Wordtune, Elicit, or Grammarly; and eventually word processing applications like Google Docs or Microsoft Word. Consider incorporating flexibility into your guidelines to account for this range of tools and for rapid, ongoing developments in AI technologies.

There’s also a caution about the use of AI detection tools:

Please be aware, too, that AI detection tools are unreliable, and use of AI detection software, which is not FERPA-protected, may violate students’ privacy or intellectual property rights. Because student use of generative AI may be unprovable, we recommend that instructors take a proactive rather than reactive approach to potential academic dishonesty.

After discussing the CETL Syllabus Template and its new language about AI, I shared a few ideas for revising assignments this fall in light of the presence of generative AI tools. I walked through an “assignment makeover” for an old essay assignment, a makeover that I detailed on my blog Agile Learning last month. In that post, I suggest six questions to consider as you rethink your assignments for the fall:

  1. Why does this assignment make sense for this course?
  2. What are specific learning objectives for this assignment?
  3. How might students use AI tools while working on this assignment?
  4. How might AI undercut the goals of this assignment? How could you mitigate this?
  5. How might AI enhance the assignment? Where would students need help figuring that out?
  6. Focus on the process. How could you make the assignment more meaningful for students or support them more in the work?

There were two big questions that emerged from the Q&A portion of the workshop. One, is there any practical way to determine if a piece of student work was ghostwritten by ChatGPT? Answer: No, not really. All the AI detectors are unreliable to one degree or another. Two, how might we teach students about the limitations of AI tools, like the fact that they output things that are not true? Answer: One approach is to have students work with these tools and critique their outputs, like these divinity school faculty did in the spring. (I think that example is my favorite pedagogical use of ChatGPT that I’ve encountered thus far.)

What’s next for this topic? Bob and I shared a few possibilities for UM instructors:

  • Auburn University has opened its online, asynchronous “Teaching with AI” course to faculty across the SEC, which includes UM faculty. This course is a time commitment (maybe 10 to 15 hours), but it’s full of examples of assignments that have been redesigned for an age of AI. Reach out to Bob Cummings if you’re interested in taking this course.
  • Marc Watkins, lecturer in writing and rhetoric and now also an academic innovation fellow at AIG, has also built a course available to UM instructors. It’s called “Introduction to Generative AI,” and it offers a lot for faculty, staff, and students interested in building their AI literacy, something Marc recommended in his recent Washington Post interview. To gain access, just contact me.
  • This past summer, the UM Department of Writing & Rhetoric offered an AI summer institute for teachers of writing. At some point this fall, they’re planning to offer the institute again for UM faculty, but with a broader scope. Keep an eye out for announcements about this second offering.
  • Here at CETL, our staff of teaching consultants are available to talk with UM instructors about course and assignment design that integrates or mitigates the use of generative AI. You’re welcome to contact me or any of our staff with questions.
  • Finally, we’re planning two more events in this CETL/AIG series on teaching and AI, both on Zoom later this semester. “Teaching in the Age of AI: What’s Working, What’s Not” is scheduled for September 18th, and “Generative AI in the Classroom: The Student Perspective” is scheduled for October 10th. See our Events page for details and registration.

What Instructors Need to Know When Working with Neurodivergent Students, September 8th

· Aug 8, 2023 ·

by Liz Norell, associate director of instructional supportAn abstract illustration of a brain with multicolored overlapping circles

The CETL workshop “What Instructors Need to Know When Working with Neurodivergent Students” will be held on September 8th from noon to 1:00 pm in Johnson Commons East Ballroom. Register for the event here.

Chances are good that you’ve seen or heard someone use the words “neurodivergent” or “neurodiverse” recently. That said, it’s not always clear exactly what these words mean or how they might impact the work we do with students.

The Chronicle of Higher Education recently reported that “up to 2 percent of undergraduates are autistic, and 19 percent have ADHD. Many more have anxiety disorder and depression.” These are reported cases, but we know many more students have them. There are systemic barriers around diagnosis and reporting of mental health conditions–cost and time two large ones. Students (and your colleagues) face stigma around disability and a lack of awareness, too. Chances are good more than a quarter of your students has a disability–whether you (or they) know it.

Defining terms

Let’s start with some terms:

  • Neurodivergent: a person with a brain that processes information in a way different from most individuals.
  • Neurotypical: a person with a brain that processes information in a way typical of most individuals.
  • Neurodiverse: a group of people with diverse ways of processing information, including those considered typical.

Any classroom will be a neurodiverse space because it will always include students and instructors with diverse ways of knowing, processing information, and learning.

Neurodivergent people have some condition that impacts how their brains work. For example, they may have a learning disability, attention deficit or anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, Tourette’s syndrome, or bipolar disorder, to name a few.

A wide range of conditions are clustered under the umbrella of “neurodivergent.” This makes knowing how to anticipate the needs of neurodivergent students feel daunting, maybe even overwhelming.

In this workshop, we will share actionable advice with instructors on how to create learning spaces that facilitate success for neurodivergent students.

The CETL workshop “What Instructors Need to Know When Working with Neurodivergent Students” will be held on September 8th from noon to 1:00 pm in Johnson Commons East Ballroom. Register for the event here.


Sign up to get an email whenever we post something new on the blog

Generative AI on the Syllabus, August 11th

· Aug 2, 2023 ·

A robot writing on a sheet of paper on a cluttered desk, as imagined by Midjourney“Generative AI on the Syllabus” is a just-in-time-for-fall workshop sponsored by the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning and the Academic Innovations Group.

What policies on using ChatGPT and other generative AI tools should you have in your fall courses? Should you attempt to ban them? Embrace them? Explore them with your students? And how will you talk with your students about AI tools through your syllabus and class conversations? In an interactive Zoom workshop on Friday, August 11th, facilitators Derek Bruff (CETL) and Robert Cummings (AIG) will explore these questions and suggest policy options and potential syllabus language for instructors to use.

Date: Friday, August 11th
Time: 
10:00 am to 11:00 am
Location: 
Zoom
Facilitators: 
Derek Bruff, visiting associate director, CETL, and Robert Cummings, executive director, Academic Innovations Group

Click here to register for this event. A Zoom link will be sent in advance to registrants.

For something of a preview of this workshop, see page 8 of the new CETL Syllabus Template, which offers suggested language about generative AI you can use on your fall course syllabus.


Sign up to get an email whenever we post something new on the blog

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
The University of Mississippi logo
EEO Statement Give Us Your Feedback Accessibility Ethics Line UM Creed
Copyright © 2025 The University of Mississippi. All Rights Reserved.